Thoughts on Education, Leadership & Administration
"The best thing for being sad," replied Merlyn. . ."is to learn something. That is the only thing that never fails."
- T.H. White, The Once and Future King
- T.H. White, The Once and Future King
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Wordle about Partnering and Curriculum
Thoughts on Partnering in the Classroom. . . . .
Partnering, as explained by Marc Prensky is ". . letting students focus on the part of the learning process that they can do best, and letting teachers focus on the part of the learning process that they can do best." (Prensky, 2010 Teaching Digital Natives)
Is this possible in today's classroom? In my opinion - absolutely. Will it take a bit of a perspective shift and perhaps a bit more initial set-up work? Perhaps, but I bet it is not as much as you think. Partnering is not a new idea. It is a new term for older ideas, with a little bit of a spin. I would bet that most teachers do a lot of partnering without even knowing it and therefore putting it all together shouldn't be as overwhelming as it might seem.
My recipe for Partnering is below:
take an integrated classroom,
add a good sized amount of differentiated instruction,
a bunch of inquiry-based learning,
sprinkle in some real-life experience,
a dash of constructivism and
all the technology available.
Encourage discussion, collaboration, mistakes and do-overs.
Ta-da! You have now created a partnered classroom.
The hardest part about partnering, in my eyes, will be for teachers letting go of their idea that they are responsible for imparting all knowledge, and embracing the idea of students and teachers learning things together. This is not to say that the teacher is replaceable - far from it! They need to present the curriculum, and model the learning process, and sometimes that means trying things they aren't 100% confident about. Sometimes it will mean making mistakes and showing the class how to learn from those mistakes. Scary, for sure, but a vital piece of the educational process and one that cannot be done with out the teachers.
This also cannot be done without technology. We need to wake up and embrace the technology because it is not going anywhere, and the Millennials that we are teaching are only getting more and more immersed in it. Technology is much more than trying to incorporate the use the internet or trying to find a way to make a video game educational - it is about digital communication, expanding horizons and experiencing things that you couldn't afford/have time to do otherwise.
Start slowly, play with some things yourself, or if you are willing, be brave and ask the students to show you some ideas. You don't have to reinvent the wheel - take that lesson that you have where the students give an oral response to and put it on voicethread. This way they can use their cell phones and call in their presentation, or use their webcam to respond. I bet their engagement will go through the roof!
Check back in a little while for some other ideas and feel free to share you own!
Friday, July 15, 2011
Glogster to help teachers teach with an ipad
This is a glogster I created to assist teachers in sorting through the tremendous number of apps that could be helpful in a classroom setting. Please let me know if you know of others that I should be aware of!
Glogster Link
Glogster Link
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Wordle about School
This is a wordle I found on-line. I LOVE IT! I love that there are technology phrases in it as well as the more traditional thoughts on school. Had to post it! Click on it to make it bigger, and for those of you who are unfamiliar with wordle, it is a great program that makes art out of the words you list. The more frequently you use the word, the larger it appears. Check it out - wordle.net
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
As a former science teacher, I have a soft spot for Albert Einstein. One of my favorite quotes attributed to him is: "Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learned in school."
My interpretation of this idea directly relates to the shift in the educational paradigm towards teaching 21st century skills and not just curriculum. True education - is it curricular? Is it content area knowledge that (in some cases) becomes obsolete by the time the next version of the textbook comes out, or is it the skills, behaviors and habits of mind that teachers so deftly weave into their classroom routines?
Does it have to be the same for everyone?
Does it differ by subject, course or grade level?
I don't know for sure, but I do know that I always believed that my job as a teacher in high school was more than just explaining curriculum. It was about giving and getting respect, about looking people in the eye and enunciating when you spoke, about not reading directly from the powerpoint slides when giving a presentation, and about learning how to work effectively with people whether you liked them or not, (among other things). These things don't change from class to class and therefore get utilized repeatedly, which means they will survive the summer vacation memory loss. These lessons can be used at home, at work, in college, on a date - they are applicable everywhere.
I think back to what I taught in my very first Biology class, and what I was teaching in my last Biology class, 8 years later - the number of kingdoms changed from 5 to 6; Pluto was no longer a classified as a planet; Titalik, the "missing link" was discovered by archeologists; scientists and medical doctors agree that brain cells can regenerate and you are not "born with all the brain cells you will ever have". . . .I could go on and on. Does that make what I was teaching less valuable? Does it make my skills and knowledge (and all of that money I spent on college tuition) in Science a waste? No. But it does open my mind as an educator. My job as a science teacher was only ever in part about my content knowledge. I was there to get students excited about science by teaching them what I know - but it was also about giving them a foundation for learning in general - this way, when everything else is forgotten; their knowledge of how to learn will still be in place.
What do you think?
My interpretation of this idea directly relates to the shift in the educational paradigm towards teaching 21st century skills and not just curriculum. True education - is it curricular? Is it content area knowledge that (in some cases) becomes obsolete by the time the next version of the textbook comes out, or is it the skills, behaviors and habits of mind that teachers so deftly weave into their classroom routines?
Does it have to be the same for everyone?
Does it differ by subject, course or grade level?
I don't know for sure, but I do know that I always believed that my job as a teacher in high school was more than just explaining curriculum. It was about giving and getting respect, about looking people in the eye and enunciating when you spoke, about not reading directly from the powerpoint slides when giving a presentation, and about learning how to work effectively with people whether you liked them or not, (among other things). These things don't change from class to class and therefore get utilized repeatedly, which means they will survive the summer vacation memory loss. These lessons can be used at home, at work, in college, on a date - they are applicable everywhere.
I think back to what I taught in my very first Biology class, and what I was teaching in my last Biology class, 8 years later - the number of kingdoms changed from 5 to 6; Pluto was no longer a classified as a planet; Titalik, the "missing link" was discovered by archeologists; scientists and medical doctors agree that brain cells can regenerate and you are not "born with all the brain cells you will ever have". . . .I could go on and on. Does that make what I was teaching less valuable? Does it make my skills and knowledge (and all of that money I spent on college tuition) in Science a waste? No. But it does open my mind as an educator. My job as a science teacher was only ever in part about my content knowledge. I was there to get students excited about science by teaching them what I know - but it was also about giving them a foundation for learning in general - this way, when everything else is forgotten; their knowledge of how to learn will still be in place.
What do you think?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)